Uber Ends Its EV Bonus & Launches a $4,000 EV Purchase Grant

— By Sergio Avedian —

As the rideshare industry landscape evolves, Uber is making a notable shift in how it incentivizes drivers who switch to electric vehicles (EVs). 

For years, the company offered trip-based bonuses for drivers using fully electric vehicles. Now, it’s replacing or at least reworking that model by launching a new purchase-grant program worth up to $4,000 for eligible drivers (read the small print) who buy an EV. 

The move signals both an acknowledgment of cost barriers and a recalibration of the incentives strategy for driver-partners.

The Previous Model: EV Trip Bonuses

Uber’s earlier approach to incentivizing EV adoption centered on extra pay per ride. For example, drivers of fully electric vehicles were eligible for what was called the “Zero Emissions” incentive, earning about $1 extra per trip, up to a maximum of $4,000 per year.

Over time, however, the structure of these bonuses changed. In some markets, they shifted to a threshold model (for example, complete 200 EV rides in a 30-day period to earn a flat bonus) rather than pay per trip. That change frustrated many drivers who felt the new thresholds made it harder to realize the full benefit.

As of November 3, the Uber EV bonus is coming to an end in many cities, but will continue until December 2025 in some others. So to that effect, the old trip-bonus model has become less attractive, less transparent, and increasingly uneven across geographies.

The New Model: $4,000 EV Purchase Grant

In response to these shifting dynamics and as the federal EV tax credit has ended, Uber has introduced a new “grant” program for drivers who purchase an EV. The program is part of Uber’s broader aim to accelerate the transition to a zero-emissions platform. 

To qualify for this grant, a driver has to be in the Diamond Uber Pro tier and must give 100 trips in 30 days after they register the vehicle on the Uber platform!

• In certain U.S. states (California, New York, Colorado, and Massachusetts), Uber has rolled out a program offering up to $4,000 per eligible driver who switches to a battery-electric vehicle (BEV) or fuel-cell electric vehicle (FCEV).

• This shift is tied to Uber rebranding its “Uber Green” service to “Uber Electric” in the U.S., signalling a more aggressive push toward electrification in its ride-hail fleet.

• The grant is positioned to partially fill the gap left by the expiration of the federal EV tax credit (which had previously helped lessen the premium cost of EVs).

In short: instead of simply paying drivers more for doing EV trips, the incentive is shifting toward helping drivers acquire the EV in the first place.

Why the Shift?

There are several reasons why Uber is pivoting this way:

1. Upfront cost is a barrier. Even with lower fuel and maintenance costs, many drivers balk at the higher purchase/lease cost of EVs (especially when they’re used intensely as rideshare vehicles). By offering a $4k grant, Uber is attacking the ignition point of adoption rather than the operating margin alone.

2. Trip-based incentives have diminishing returns. When bonus pay is heavily tied to trip counts (e.g., 200 rides/month) or strict thresholds, some drivers feel the model becomes unpredictable and harder to rely on. That undermines the incentive’s value.

3. A broader sustainability goal. Uber has publicly committed to having 100% of rides in the U.S., Canada, and Europe take place in zero-emission vehicles (or public transit/ micromobility) by 2030, and globally by 2040. Making EV adoption more accessible for drivers helps enable that vision. These deadlines will not be met, and they are already being pushed out!

4. Changing external incentives. With federal EV tax credits winding down and EV purchasing subsidies shifting, Uber likely sees the need to step up direct driver support if it expects high uptake.

What Drivers Should Know Before Leaping In

The $4,000 grant is compelling, but like all incentive programs, the fine print matters. Here are key considerations:

• Eligibility varies by state and by driver-partner status. The pilot programs noted are in select states so far (CA, NY, CO, MA). Be sure to check local terms and availability.

• Vehicle type matters. The grant is tied to battery-electric or fuel-cell vehicles; plug-in hybrids are excluded under these newer EV-only schemes.

• Usage requirements may apply. The earlier “200 rides in 30 days” model highlighted how Uber might tie requirements to incentives. For purchase grants, there will still be minimum ride/driver activity thresholds. Drivers should study all conditions.

• Infrastructure and ongoing costs still matter. Acquiring the EV is only part of the equation. Charging availability (home or public), vehicle depreciation, maintenance, and actual trip revenue still influence profitability.

• It doesn’t replace other costs entirely. A $4k grant certainly helps, but many EVs still carry a significant premium over equivalent ICE (internal-combustion engine) vehicles, especially for drivers with high mileage and wear-and-tear.

• Incentive timing and existence may change. Just as the trip-bonus model was reduced or ended, this grant program may be a limited-time offer or subject to change.

What This Means for the Rideshare Ecosystem

The shift from per-trip bonuses to upfront vehicle grants suggests a maturing rideshare-EV incentive strategy. For driver-partners, it indicates that platform operators like Uber view EV adoption as a more structural challenge, not just a matter of optimizing per-trip economics, but of lowering the barrier to EV entry altogether.

From a fleet-and-mobility-sector perspective, it also signals that rideshare companies are moving beyond “incentive trials” toward scaled electrification. They’re recognizing that unless drivers can feasibly access the EVs in the first place, trip-based bonuses may not be enough to catalyze broad change.

For drivers, the net impact depends on individual circumstances: mileage, local charging infrastructure, vehicle purchase vs. lease cost, and trips achievable in an EV. A well-informed switch could yield stronger long-term economics; a poorly timed one could increase risk.

My Take

Uber has effectively acknowledged that the economics of driving an EV in the rideshare environment need stronger support, hence the move toward a $4,000 purchase grant. 

For drivers willing to make the switch, in eligible states and under favorable conditions, this incentive could make EV ownership more attainable and economically rational.

However, drivers should not assume the grant alone makes EVs an automatic win. Ongoing costs, infrastructure, vehicle longevity, and incentive terms remain critical. The transition from bonus to grant is a positive step, but only one piece of the EV-driving puzzle.

For any driver considering the switch, the question becomes: Does the combination of grant + reduced operating cost + viable charging access + matching vehicle choice make sense for me? If yes, the time to evaluate may be now. If no, caution and extra due diligence are warranted.

Please send me your comments at [email protected]

Sergio@rsg

Did someone forward you this newsletter? Subscribe now for free so you never miss an update…

Never miss a Rideshare Guy update…

Twitter/X │ YouTube │ Instagram │Facebook │ LinkedIn │ TikTok